Subtract
Subtract

Stanley Miller’s Experiment

Stanley Miller’s Experiment

Stanley Miller was an American chemist who was famous for landmark experiments relating to the origin of life. The historic Miller–Urey experiment showed that some complex organic molecules could be synthesized from simpler inorganic ones. The experiment was widely publicized and many claimed it provided support for the idea of a chemical evolution of the early Earth.

Many evolutionary biologists and atheists argue that the whole system ( universe, galaxies, stars, planets et al ), given enough time can randomly arrange itself in a way to make life possible through a process of chemical evolution.

An example of whats wrong

Picture this, lets take a honey bee and observe its flight path over a lifetime and map it in two dimensions. What are the chances of this path at some point resembling an alphabet ? I’d say quite high. Lets take this a bit further, what are the chances of say, getting a full word in sequence ? Now imagine the chance of a sentence. Im willing to bet its ridiculously low.

If I told you its possible, that the alphabets formed by tracing the path of this bee in flight is exactly the same as the text found in a book, say Moby Dick, how absurd does that sound ? Taking it a step further, if I say its possible for the bee to completely by random chance write Moby Dick in a span of one hour, would you not doubt my sanity ?

Yet this is precisely how many evolutionary biologists claim, the source of all information needed for intelligent life put itself together, via chemical evolution.

Why is this scientifically absurd ?

1) Contrary to Miller’s assumption of a strongly reducing condition, the primitive atmosphere was quite neutral, and contained gases in very different proportions.

2) Random chance may get you a brick (amino acid or a protein) but to extend that and say a perfectly architected building also can happen by random chance is not very logical.

3) There is simply not enough time for this to happen, studies in modern physics on the nature of time show that time is not infinite. There are only 1018 seconds in the entire history of the universe.

4) There are only approximately 1066 atoms in our entire galaxy. Statistically this is not enough for all the permutations and combinations required, for the information needed for life, to create itself.

5) Mathematically, there is a greater chance of a big ball of fire to exploding and creating a computer, which then typed the article you are reading, all by itself, than say for a single human DNA molecule to create itself.

There are several other studies and papers like the one on the Anthropic principle ( discussed in another post ), hyper-dimensionality, studies on the speed of light among others that completely destroy any possibility of the universe and life putting itself together by chance or by means of chemical evolution.

Further Reading

In the Beginning

Gitt, W. (2000). In the Beginning Was Information. Christliche Literatur-Verbreitung. [WorldCat, Read Online, LibraryThing, Google Books, BookFinder]

The Evolution Deceit

Yahya, H. (1999). The Evolution Deceit. Ta-Ha Publishers. [WorldCat, Read Online, LibraryThing, Google Books, BookFinder]

Popular Tags

Optimization
Code
Code
Optimization
Startup
Religion

Related Posts

See more

Jobs almost killed the iPhone

The iPod accounted for more than half of Apple’s sales back in the day. It was the cornerstone product Steve Jobs could not allow to fail. However, it became increasingly evident that a music player alone was insufficient, with a phone incorporated it would be much more practical. The solution was plain; Apple had to produce its own future phone in order to stay competitive.

In addition to the iPod, the era of iPod-based Apple was also coming to an end. Engineering personnel within Apple had been proposing this concept since the early 2000s. Despite this, Steve demonstrated conviction. Apple would not create a cellular gadget in the near future. For one, he appeared to have a distaste for corporations. In 1984, when introducing the first-ever Macintosh, Steve presented Apple as a “rebel force” which provided optimism against the “evil empire,” IBM.

Apple grew into a large corporation itself – but not surprisingly it remained in Steve’s view as the “world’s largest startup.” Creating a smartphone necessitated interacting with phone carriers such as Verizon, also known as the malevolent titans of industry.

Jobs, in particular, predicted that smartphones would evolve not as a must-have status symbol, but rather as a glorified Swiss army knife that appealed to a geekier, “pocket protector” crowd, as he called it.

It took herculean efforts of his engineers like Sakoman and others to convince Jobs to build the phone. this was their first iPhone .

The rest they say is history – unlike what most people think it was this iconic move that made apple a trillion dollar company.

If you don’t find ways to kill your product  the market most certainly will

  • 2 mins read

GuerrillaFoo

Guerrilla marketing is always something I’ve been a fan of.  The gist of it is that it’s a  strategy that utilizes unconventional and creative tactics to promote a product or service, typically on a low budget. This type of marketing is highly targeted and aims to create buzz and generate attention. I’ll share a story here that caught my attention during startup school.

Legend has it that there was this big fintech conference happening in the valley and to have your logo featured on the stage and in other places – you needed to pay for a sponsorship that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Stripe was a young startup back then and it was taking on PayPal – the Goliath. What the team at Stripe did was take some bank notes, put them in a bucket and froze them overnight. On the day of the conference they turned up to the venue – put the money (now inside ice cubes) near the entrance and held a placard saying – “Paypal freezes your money – Try Stripe !”. This got the attention of EVERY single person at the conference. Stripe also did something clever – they paid the bellhops at the hotels and had them slip a brochure of their product into every room which had conference attendees. This would have cost a bomb to do otherwise – sponsoring the event and include this brochure as part of the SWAG kit. One thing was clear, at the end of this event, every single person knew about Stripe, was discussing their antics and several of them tried Stripe over the coming days.

The next story is somewhat different. On average a successful startup returns about 676% over the course of its lifetime – Wufoo returned around 30,000% ! Yes you red that right if you had invested $10k during their initial fundraise, you would have made around $30M when they were sold to SurveyMonkey a few years later. Such outliers naturally grab my attention and I was looking at some of the things they did right.

I’ll share a story of when they used a form of  Guerrilla marketing to get outsized returns. Most companies in the 2000s used to run hackathons when they came out with a new API and used to give out iPads or iPhones as prizes – this was the norm and was getting kind of boring. Wufoo wanted to try something different, the founding team and early employees were medieval nuts. They contacted a forge and got an actual battle axe built which would be the prize. Talk about weaponizing programming !!

At the end of this hackathon Wufoo got an Android app, an iPhone app and a WordPress plugin for their platform. This would be otherwise impossible to build for the small team with the money and resources they had. Lots of developers continued to remember and discuss this cool hackathon in the coming days and the traction in dev community was unbelievable.

  • 3 mins read

Instaform ?

Ship fast and improve faster based on what customers tell you – this has always been our mantra. The faster we can start getting feedback from customers – the faster we can iterate and improve our offering. This feedback loop is oxygen for startups like us,  it helps us validate our ideas, identify problems early on, and adjust our approach accordingly. A couple of extreme examples of this approach caught my eye recently.

Brex calls themselves the OS of scaling startups and have a great banking experience today – I have tried a few similar services myself and can say their product is among the best. The story is when they started off they just had a web form and a virtual credit card they could generate with an internal tool. With that they started on boarding customers. Imagine running a bank like this – no login, no way to see spends, no way to manage accounts or any of the things we take for granted. EVERY SINGLE one of these features was built in once the product was live and was based on customer feedback and needs. Pretty amazing and takes a lots of guts to do.

The next story is from Instacart – a grocery delivery and pick-up app. This product was launched with just a form on the site. Users literally filled up a form with their grocery list and the founder or her friends drove around, picked up the stuff and delivered. That’s it – simple and scary. Many founders I know will first try and raise a few million dollars, build sophisticated warehousing, inventory management and mobile apps before earning that 1st dollar in revenue.

  • 2 mins read
Subtract

Menu

Subscribe

Sign up for articles on how you can put AI to work for you

©2023 All rights reserved
Scroll to Top